Israel carried out an airstrike on southern Beirut on Sunday, breaking a fragile ceasefire with Lebanon. The attacks come days after Israeli President Netanyahu made a criticized visit to occupied areas in southern Syria.
On November 23, 2025, Israel carried out an airstrike on the southern suburbs of Beirut, breaking a months-long ceasefire with Hezbollah. The attack killed five people and injured nearly thirty, including civilians in the densely populated area.
Hezbollah is an Iranian-backed Shiite political and military movement with an armed wing with a strong foothold in southern Lebanon, but is outside the control of the Lebanese state. According to Israel, the target was Hezbollah's military commander, Haytham Ali Tabtabai, who is also said to have confirmed dead shortly after the attack.
Two days earlier, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun had said the country was ready to negotiate with Israel to end the cross-border attacks. In a new statement shortly after the airstrike, the president described the attack as “further proof” that Israel is ignoring repeated calls to desist from aggression against Lebanon. Aoun also called on the international community to act to stop the attacks and protect the people of Lebanon, the state-run Turkish news channel reports. Anadolu Agency.
The armed conflict, with regular Israeli airstrikes against targets in southern Lebanon and recurring rocket fire from Hezbollah, has been ongoing along the border between Israel and Lebanon since October 2023.
Last fall, a ceasefire was reached between the parties, which both sides have been accused of violating: Israel through repeated airstrikes and military operations in southern Lebanon, and Hezbollah through a number of rocket attacks and military activities.
From the Israeli perspective, the attack on Beirut is described as a necessary response to what is perceived as Hezbollah's increasing military activity and reconstruction during the ceasefire. According to Times of Israel Netanyahu reportedly stressed during a cabinet meeting hours after the attack that Israel "will continue to strike against terrorism on multiple fronts."
BBC reports that Hezbollah has stated that Israel has crossed a “new red line” with the attack. However, the organization has not yet announced how it intends to respond to the attack. The Lebanese government has in turn condemned the Israeli attack, but lacks both the capacity and the mandate to stop Hezbollah from responding militarily.
At the same time, positions are being moved forward in Syria
Days before the Beirut attack, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, along with ministers and military leaders, visited the Israeli-controlled “buffer zone” in southern Syria. He described Israel’s positions in Syria as necessary to “shape the future of the region” as well as to protect Israel and minorities in the area, especially the Druze.
Israel took military control of the area after Bashar al-Assad's ouster in December 2024. According to information from Syrian authorities, the visit was preceded by over 1,000 Israeli airstrikes and hundreds of cross-border raids since Bashar al-Assad's ouster in December 2024. ¨
Syrian President al-Sharaa reacted strongly, saying that the Israeli presence violates Syrian sovereignty and calling on Israel to withdraw, writes ReutersSeveral media outlets are reporting that UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres should have expressed concern over the fact that Israel has in practice moved its positions forward and created a more permanent military structure in the area.
Israel has at the same time made it clear that it does not intend to leave the zone in the foreseeable future, on the contrary, Israeli demands for a “completely demilitarized” zone south of Damascus.
Syrian President Al-Sharaa has previously signaled cautious openness to future normalization with Israel. The latest developments raise questions that the prospects for such an agreement are now at risk of slipping further away.
Commentary: A more dangerous phase – when the region becomes more unpredictable
Israel's attack in Beirut, along with its deepening presence in southern Syria, shows that the country's conflicts are closely linked. For Israel, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria are not seen as separate fronts, but as parts of a common regional threat in which Hezbollah's links to Iran, Hamas and Syrian militias weigh heavily.
The latest actions indicate a strategic shift: from deterrence to actively shaping the situation on the ground. By striking Hezbollah’s leadership while simultaneously consolidating positions in Syria, Israel wants to reduce the risk of a coordinated escalation on the border. But any offensive risks setting off regional chain reactions, especially since the Lebanese government has limited control over Hezbollah and Syria is now mobilizing diplomatically against Israel’s presence.
What happens next depends on Hezbollah’s response and how other regional actors choose to act. The possibilities range from a broader escalation, to a protracted low-level conflict, or a new, fragile calm driven by international pressure. But with multiple fronts active at the same time, small changes can quickly have major consequences.
Is there something in the text that is not correct? Contact us at opinion@fuf.se